The effects of selected sedatives on basal and stimulated serum cortisol concentrations in healthy dogs.

Background: Hormone assessment is typically recommended for awake, unsedated dogs. However, one of the most commonly asked questions from veterinary practitioners to the endocrinology laboratory is how sedation impacts cortisol concentrations and the adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test. Butorphanol, dexmedetomidine, and trazodone are common sedatives for dogs, but their impact on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of butorphanol, dexmedetomidine, and trazodone on serum cortisol concentrations. Methods: Twelve healthy beagles were included in a prospective, randomized, four-period crossover design study with a 7-day washout. ACTH stimulation test results were determined after saline (0.5 mL IV), butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg IV), dexmedetomidine (4 µg/kg IV), and trazodone (3-5 mg/kg PO) administration. Results: Compared to saline, butorphanol increased basal (median 11.75 µg/dL (range 2.50-23.00) (324.13 nmol/L; range 68.97-634.48) vs 1.27 µg/dL (0.74-2.10) (35.03 nmol/L; 20.41-57.93); P < 0.0001) and post-ACTH cortisol concentrations (17.05 µg/dL (12.40-26.00) (470.34 nmol/L; 342.07-717.24) vs 13.75 µg/dL (10.00-18.90) (379.31 nmol/L; 275.96-521.38); P ≤ 0.0001). Dexmedetomidine and trazodone did not significantly affect basal (1.55 µg/dL (range 0.75-1.55) (42.76 nmol/L; 20.69-42.76); P = 0.33 and 0.79 µg/dL (range 0.69-1.89) (21.79 nmol/L; 19.03-52.14); P = 0.13, respectively, vs saline 1.27 (0.74-2.10) (35.03 nmol/L; 20.41-57.93)) or post-ACTH cortisol concentrations (14.35 µg/dL (range 10.70-18.00) (395.86 nmol/L; 295.17-496.55); (P = 0.98 and 12.90 µg/dL (range 8.94-17.40) (355.86 nmol/L; 246.62-480); P = 0.65), respectively, vs saline 13.75 µg/dL (10.00-18.60) (379.31 nmol/L; 275.86-513.10). Conclusion: Butorphanol administration should be avoided prior to ACTH stimulation testing in dogs. Further evaluation of dexmedetomidine and trazodone's effects on adrenocortical hormone testing in dogs suspected of HPA derangements is warranted to confirm they do not impact clinical diagnosis.

Electroencephalographic spectrogram-guided total intravenous anesthesia using dexmedetomidine and propofol prevents unnecessary anesthetic dosing during craniotomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The bispectral index (BIS) may be unreliable to gauge anesthetic depth when dexmedetomidine is administered. By comparison, the electroencephalogram (EEG) spectrogram enables the visualization of the brain response during anesthesia and may prevent unnecessary anesthetic consumption. METHODS: This retrospective study included 140 adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy who received total intravenous anesthesia using a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusions. Patients were equally matched to the spectrogram group (maintaining the robust EEG alpha power during surgery) or the index group (maintaining the BIS score between 40 and 60 during surgery) based on the propensity score of age and surgical type. The primary outcome was the propofol dose. Secondary outcome was the postoperative neurological profile. RESULTS: Patients in the spectrogram group received significantly less propofol (1585 ± 581 vs. 2314 ± 810 mg, P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the spectrogram group exhibited delayed emergence (1.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.033). The postoperative delirium profile was similar between the groups (profile P = 0.227). Patients in the spectrogram group exhibited better in-hospital Barthel's index scores changes (admission state: 83.6 ± 27.6 vs. 91.6 ± 17.1; discharge state: 86.4 ± 24.3 vs. 85.1 ± 21.5; group-time interaction P = 0.008). However, the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: EEG spectrogram-guided anesthesia prevents unnecessary anesthetic consumption during elective craniotomy. This may also prevent delayed emergence and improve postoperative Barthel index scores.

Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine do not prolong analgesia in wound infiltration for lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely used to infiltrate into surgical wounds for postoperative analgesia. Different adjuvants like dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine, when added to LA agents, could improve and prolong analgesia. The aim of this trial was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing properties of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine when added to ropivacaine for wound infiltration in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: We conducted a controlled study among 68 adult patients undergoing TLIF, which was prospective, randomized and double-blind in nature. The participants were divided into four equal groups at random. Group R was given 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL) and 15 mL of normal saline. Group R + DXM received 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL) and 10 mg of dexamethasone (15 mL). Group R + DEX received 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL) and 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine (15 mL). Lastly, group R + DXM + DEX was given 150 mg of 1% ropivacaine (15 mL), 10 mg of dexamethasone and 1 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine (15 mL). The primary focus was on the length of pain relief provided. Additionally, secondary evaluations included the amount of hydromorphone taken after surgery, the numerical rating scale and safety assessments within 48 h after the operation. RESULTS: Based on the p value (P > 0.05), there was no significant variance in the duration of pain relief or the total usage of hydromorphone after surgery across the four groups. Similarly, the numerical rating scale scores at rest and during activity at 6-, 12-, 24- and 48-h post-surgery for all four groups showed no difference (P > 0.05). However, the incidence of delayed anesthesia recovery was slightly higher in group R + DEX and group R + DXM + DEX when compared to group R or group R + DXM. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the four groups in terms of vomiting, nausea, dizziness or delayed anesthesia recovery. CONCLUSION: For wound infiltration in TLIF, the addition of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine did not result in any clinically significant reduction in pain or opioid consumption and could prompt some side effects.

Comparison of Caudal Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Infra-Umbilical Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: We explored the analgesic efficacy of two non-opioid adjuvants (midazolam and dexmedetomidine) with ropivacaine in children undergoing infraumbilical surgeries. METHODS: In this parallel group randomized controlled trial, 135 children aged between 2 and 8 years were recruited. Children were randomly allocated to one of three groups: RD received 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine (0.2%) with dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg, RM received 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine (0.2%) with midazolam 30 µg/kg, and R received 1 mL/kg of ropivacaine (0.2%) with 1 mL normal saline. The primary outcome of the present study was to determine the duration of postoperative analgesia. Secondary outcomes were assessing postoperative face, leg, activity, cry, consolability (FLACC) pain score, rescue analgesics, hemodynamics, sedation scores, and adverse effects. RESULTS: The analgesia duration was significantly prolonged in the RD and RM group (600.0 [480.0-720.0] minutes and 600.0 [480.0-720.0] minutes, respectively) compared to the R group 360.0 (300.0-480.0) minutes (P < 0.001). The FLACC score was comparatively higher in the R group compared to the RD and RM groups postoperatively. Time for the first rescue analgesia was more prolonged in RD and RM groups when compared with the R group. Postoperative sedation was higher in the RM group up to 120 minutes postoperatively compared to the RD and R groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of dexmedetomidine or midazolam with local anesthetics significantly increases the analgesia duration while minimizing adverse effects.

Prospective, randomised comparison of two intravenous sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging in children.

BACKGROUND: Children usually need sedation or even anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. As there is no universally accepted method for this purpose we undertook a prospective, randomised comparison of propofol and dexmedetomidine in children aged 1 to 10 years. METHODS: After Institutional Board approval and parents' informed consent 64 ASA status I or II children scheduled for MRI scan were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with intravenous (IV) midazolam (0.1 mg kg -1 ) and ketamine (1 mg kg -1 ) and randomised to propofol (P) or dexmedetomidine (D) group. A propofol bolus of 1 mg kg -1 followed by infusion of 4 mg kg -1 h -1 , or dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 followed by 2 µg kg -1 h-1 infusion were used. Heart rate, SpO 2 and non-invasive blood pressure were monitored and recorded at 5 min intervals. Results were compared by means of standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Both dexmedetomidine and propofol after premedication with ketamine and midazolam are suitable for MRI sedation, although propofol use results in shorter recovery time. Less interventions are needed when dexmedetomidine is used.

Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine-midazolam, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, and midazolam-ketamine for premedication in paediatric patients: a double-blinded randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric patients are a population with a high level of anxiety. The prevention of perioperative stress in a frightened child is important to render the child calm and cooperative for smoother induction. Intranasal premedication is easy and safe, and the drug is rapidly absorbed into the systemic circulation, ensuring early onset of sedation in children and good effectiveness. METHODS: 150 patients in the age group 2-4 years, ASA class I, undergoing elective surgical procedures were enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: a DM group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 ), a DK group (receiving intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg -1 and keta-mine 2 mg kg -1 ), and an MK group (receiving intranasal midazolam 0.12 mg kg -1 and ketamine 2 mg kg -1 ). After 30 minutes of administration of the drugs, the patients were assessed for parent separation anxiety, sedation, ease of IV cannulation, and mask acceptance. RESULTS: The comparison among the 3 groups showed a statistically significant difference for ease of IV cannulation and mask acceptance at 30 minutes, with a P -value of 0.010 with CI of 0.0-0.02, and P -value 0.007 with CI 0.0-0.02, respectively. The parent separation anxiety and sedation score at 30 minutes was statistically insignificant with a P -value of 0.82 with CI of 0.03-0.14 and P -value 0.631 with CI of 0.38-0.58, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of midazolam and ketamine had a better clinical profile for premedication as compared to other combination drugs used in our study in terms of IV cannulation and acceptance of masks with a comparable decrease in separation anxiety from parents and adequate sedation.

Dexmedetomidina, un agonista de alfa 2, incrementa el efecto analgésico de la morfina y reduce el desarrollo de tolerancia a la morfina suprimiendo el estrés oxidativo y la vía de señalización de TNF/IL-1 en ratas / Dexmedetomidine, an alfa 2 agonist, increases the morphine analgesic effect and decreases morphine tolerance development by suppressing oxidative stress and TNF/IL-1 signalling pathway in rats

Antecedentes: El objetivo del presente estudio es examinar el posible efecto de dexmedetomidina en el desarrollo de tolerancia a la morfina en ratas, incluyendo nocicepción, analgesia con morfina, apoptosis, estrés oxidativo, y las vías del factor de necrosis tumoral (TNF)/interleucina-1 (IL-1). Materiales y métodos: En este estudio se utilizaron 36 ratas Wistar Albino (225–245 g) dividiéndose a los animales en seis grupos: solución salina (S), 20 mcg/kg de dexmedetomidina (D), 5 mg/kg de morfina (M), M + D, tolerancia a la morfina (MT), y MT + D. El efecto analgésico se midió mediante las pruebas analgésicas de placa caliente (hot-plate) y de retirada de la cola (tail-flick). Tras dichas pruebas, se extirparon los ganglios de la raíz dorsal (GRD), y se midieron en los tejidos de los mismos los parámetros del estrés oxidativo (estado antioxidante total [TAS], estado oxidante total [TOS]), TNF, IL-1 y enzimas de la apoptosis (Caspasa-3, Caspasa-9). Resultados: Dexmedetomidina reflejó un efecto antinociceptivo al administrarse en solitario (p < 0,05 a p < 0,001). Además, dexmedetomidina incrementó el efecto analgésico de la morfina (p < 0,001), y también redujo la tolerancia a la morfina a un nivel significativo (p < 0,01 a p < 0,001), reduciendo también los niveles de estrés oxidativo (p < 0,001) y TNF/IL-1 al administrarse como fármaco adicional al grupo de dosis única de morfina y tolerancia a la morfina (p < 0,001). Además, dexmedetomidina redujo los niveles de Caspasa-3 y Caspasa-9 tras el desarrollo de tolerancia (p < 0,001). Conclusión: Dexmedetomidina tiene propiedades antinociceptivas, e incrementa el efecto analgésico de la morfina, previniendo también el desarrollo de tolerancia. Estos efectos se producen probablemente debido a la modulación del estrés oxidativo, la inflamación y la apoptosis.(AU)

Background: The aim of the present study is to examine the possible effect de dexmedetomidine on the development of morphine tolerance in rats including nociception, morphine analgesia, apoptosis, oxidative stress, and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)/ interleukin-1 (IL-1) pathways. Materials and methods: In this study, 36 Wistar Albino (225–245 g) rats were used. Animals were divided into 6 groups: saline (S), 20 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine (D), 5 mg/kg morphine (M), M + D, morphine tolerance (MT), and MT + D. The analgesic effect was measured with hot plate and tail-flick analgesia tests. After the analgesia tests, the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) tissues were excised. Oxidative stress parameters [total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS)], TNF, IL-1 and apoptosis enzymes (Caspase-3, Caspase-9), were measured in DRG tissues. Results: Dexmedetomidine showed an antinociceptive effect when given alone (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). In addition, dexmedetomidine increased the analgesic effect of morphine (p < 0.001), and also decreased the tolerance to morphine at a significant level (p < 0.01 to p < 0.001). Moreover, it decreased oxidative stress (p < 0.001) and TNF/IL-1 levels when given as an additional drug of single-dose morphine and morphine tolerance group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, dexmedetomidine decreased Caspase-3 and Caspase-9 levels after tolerance development (p < 0.001). Conclusión: Dexmedetomidine has antinociceptive properties, and it increases the analgesic effect of morphine and also prevents tolerance development. These effects probably occur by the modulation of oxidative stress, inflammation and apoptosis.(AU)

Mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination to supplement analgesia for patients after scoliosis correction surgery: a double-blind randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients often experience severe pain after scoliosis correction surgery. Esketamine and dexmedetomidine each improves analgesia but can produce side-effects. We therefore tested the hypothesis that a mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination safely improves analgesia. METHODS: Two hundred male and female adults having scoliosis correction surgery were randomised to patient-controlled sufentanil analgesia (4 µg kg-1 in normal saline) with either a combined supplement (esketamine 0.25 mg ml-1 and dexmedetomidine 1 µg ml-1) or placebo. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 72 h, defined as a numeric rating scale (NRS: 0=no pain and 10=worst pain) score ≥4 at any of seven time points. Amongst secondary outcomes, subjective sleep quality was assessed with an NRS score (0=best sleep and 10=worst sleep) for the first five postoperative nights. RESULTS: There were 199 subjects included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Mean infusion rates were 5.5 µg kg-1 h-1 for esketamine and 0.02 µg kg-1 h-1 for dexmedetomidine. The primary outcome incidence was lower with the combined supplement (65.7% [65/99]) than with placebo (86.0% [86/100]; relative risk 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.90; P=0.001). Subjects given the combined supplement had lower pain intensity at rest at five time points (median difference -1 point; P≤0.005), lower pain intensity with movement at six time points (median difference -1 point; P≤0.001), and better subjective sleep quality for the first 5 postoperative nights (median difference -2 to -1 points; P<0.001). Adverse events did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The mini-dose esketamine-dexmedetomidine combination safely improved analgesia and subjective sleep quality after scoliosis correction surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04791059.

Randomised, prospective, blinded, clinical trial of opioid-free injectable anaesthesia with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared an opioid-free injectable anaesthetic protocol with or without multimodal analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. METHODS: In this prospective, randomised, blinded, clinical trial, 29 healthy kittens (mean ± SD weight 1.55 ± 0.46 kg; aged 10 weeks to 6 months) were included. Anaesthesia was performed with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (4 mg/kg), dexmedetomidine (40 µg/kg) and midazolam (0.25 mg/kg). In the multimodal group (MMG), cats (n = 14) received meloxicam (0.1 mg/kg SC) and intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.25% (2 mg/kg), whereas the same volume of saline was administered in the control group (CG; n = 15). Atipamezole (0.4 mg/kg IM) was given 15 mins after ovariohysterectomy. Postoperative pain was assessed using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional feline pain assessment scale - short form. Rescue analgesia (buprenorphine 0.02 mg/kg IM in MMG/CG and meloxicam 0.1 mg/kg SC in CG) was administered if pain scores were ⩾4/12. Soft food intake (after 2 and 60 mins) was evaluated at specific time points postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed with linear models and post-hoc pairwise comparison with Benjamini-Hochberg corrections (P <0.05). RESULTS: The prevalence of rescue analgesia was higher in the CG (n = 15/15) than the MMG (n = 1/14; P <0.001). Pain scores at 1 h, 2 h and 4 h postoperatively were higher in the CG (4.1 ± 2.8, 4.8 ± 3.0 and 5.3 ± 1.2, respectively) than in the MMG (1.6 ± 1.0, 1.1 ± 1.0 and 0.9 ± 0.8, respectively; P <0.001). Food intake (%) at 1 h postoperatively was higher in the MMG after 2 and 60 mins (10.4 ± 9 and 71.9 ± 29, respectively) than in the CG (1.4 ± 2 and 13.9 ± 7, respectively; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This opioid-free protocol using multimodal analgesia produced adequate postoperative pain relief, while almost eliminating the need for rescue analgesia in kittens undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Pain decreased food intake.

Two-center randomized controlled trial comparing oral chloral hydrate and intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine for procedural sedation in children: study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Oral chloral hydrate is widely used in pediatric sedation. Intranasal dexmedetomidine has been increasingly used for pediatric sedation; however, its improvement is warranted. The combination of dexmedetomidine with ketamine can improve onset and hemodynamic stability while maintaining sedative efficacy. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine compared to oral chloral hydrate. METHODS: This is a prospective, parallel-arm, single-blinded, two-center, superiority randomized controlled trial with 1:1 allocation, designed to compare the effects of intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine with those of oral chloral hydrate. We shall enroll 136 patients aged < 7 years old in this study. Prior to the procedure, we shall randomize each patient into the control group (oral chloral hydrate 50 mg/kg) or study group (intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 µg/kg and ketamine 3 mg/kg). The primary outcome will be the rate of achieving an adequate sedation level (6-point Pediatric Sedation State Scale 1, 2, or 3) within 15 min. In addition, we shall measure the sedation time, sedation failure rate, completion of procedure, adverse events, patient acceptance, and physician satisfaction. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence of the efficacy and safety of the intranasal combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine in comparison with oral chloral hydrate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04820205. Registered on 19th March 2021.

Anestesia multimodal para ressecção de tumor cerebral com monitorização eletroneurofisiológica: relato de caso / Multimodal anesthesia for brain tumor resection with electroneurophysiological monitoring: case report

Introdução: O monitoramento neurofisiológico intraoperatório (MNIO) é uma técnica valiosa, empregada durante procedimentos neurocirúrgicos complexos. Ao monitorar continuamente as vias neurais, o MNIO fornece feedback em tempo real aos cirurgiões durante o procedimento, permitindo tomada de decisões críticas e redução do risco de déficits neurológicos. O papel do anestesiologista na identificação e correção dos fatores de risco modificáveis é fundamental para a prevenção de lesões neurológicas e otimização dos resultados. Sendo assim, a compreensão das limitações do MNIO e das evidências que orientam seu uso é de fundamental importância. Objetivo: Descrever o manejo de uma anestesia multimodal, realizada em conjunto com a equipe de neurofisiologia, para ressecção de um tumor cerebral recidivante e o seu desfecho clinico. Método: Trata-se de relato de caso atendido no Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal de São Paulo. Os dados para realização deste trabalho foram coletados durante a cirurgia, sendo a coleta autorizada pelo paciente por meio da assinatura de termo de consentimento livre e esclarecido. Relato do Caso: Paciente, sexo masculino, 64 anos, ASA II, hipertenso, com história prévia de meningioma atípico, submetido a neurocirurgia e radioterapia em 2021, em uso de anticonvulsivante oral para profilaxia de crises convulsivas. Apresenta lesão tumoral cerebral recidivante em região frontal bilateral. Após a indução anestésica, foi realizada passagem de acesso venoso central em veia jugular interna direita com auxílio de ultrassonografia, monitoração da pressão arterial invasiva após cateterização de artéria radial direita, sondagem vesical de demora, termômetro esofágico, otimização do posicionamento na mesa cirúrgica, índice bispectral e Scalp Block com 20 ml de ropicavaína a 0,375%. Realizou- se manutenção da anestesia com propofol (4-6 mg/kg/h) e remifentanil (0,1 mcg/kg/min) em infusão contínua associado a dexmedetomidina (0,2-0,6 mcg/kg/h) mantendo valores do índice bispectral entre 40-60. As respostas dos potenciais evocados foram obtidas nas extremidades superiores e inferiores durante todo o procedimento pela equipe de neurofisiologia. Durante a manipulação tumoral, foi detectada queda superior a 40% do potencial evocado motor em dimídio corporal esquerdo, e emitido o alerta à equipe cirúrgica. Nenhuma outra intercorrência foi registrada durante o procedimento. Conclusões: Propofol, dexmedetomidina, lidocaína, opioides e anestésicos voláteis potentes de baixa dosagem (menos de 0,5 CAM) associado a técnicas de bloqueios periféricos, fornecem condições compatíveis com monitoramento neurofisiológico intraoperatório. O MNIO contínuo é um complemento indispensável no período perioperatório para pacientes com alto risco de desenvolver complicações neurológicas. Os anestesistas devem fornecer um meio fisiológico e anestésico estável para facilitar a interpretação significativa das mudanças de sinal e precisa orientação cirúrgica. Palavras-chave: Adjuvantes Anestésicos. Potenciais Evocados. Neurocirurgia. Monitorização Neurofisiológica Intraoperatória.

Effects of etomidate combined with dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Etomidate has been advocated to be used in anesthesia for the elderly and the critically ill patients due to its faint effect on cardiovascular system. But the dose-dependent suppression of etomidate on adrenal cortex function leads to the limitation of its clinical application. Clinical research showed that dexmedetomidine could reduce the dose requirements for intravenous or inhalation anesthetics and opioids, and the hemodynamics was more stable during the operation. The objective was to observe the effect of etomidate combined with dexmedetomidine on adrenocortical function in elderly patients. 180 elderly patients scheduled for elective ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy were randomly allocated to PR group anesthetized with propofol-remifentanil, ER group anesthetized with etomidate-remifentanil, and ERD group anesthetized with dexmedetomidine combined with etomidate-remifentanil. Patients in each group whose operation time was less than or equal to 1 h were incorporated into short time surgery group (PR1 group, ER1 group and ERD1 group), and whose surgical procedure time was more than 1 h were incorporated into long time surgery group (PR2 group, ER2 group and ERD2 group). The primary outcome was the serum cortisol and ACTH concentration. The secondary outcomes were the values of SBP, DBP, HR and SpO2, the time of surgical procedure, the dosage of etomidate and remifentanil administered during surgery, the time to spontaneous respiration, recovery and extubation, and the duration of stay in the PACU. The Serum cortisol concentration was higher at t1~2 in ERD1 group compared to ER1 group (P < 0.05). The Serum cortisol concentration at t1~3 was higher in ERD2 group than in ER2 group (P < 0.05). The Serum ACTH concentration was lower at t1~2 in ERD1 group compared to ER1 group (P < 0.05). The Serum ACTH concentration at t1~3 was lower in ERD2 group compared to ER2 group (P < 0.05). The SBP at T1 and T3 were higher in ER2 and ERD2 group than in PR2 group (P < 0.05). The DBP in ER1 and ERD1 group were higher at T1 compared to PR1 group (P < 0.05). The dosage of etomidate was significantly lower in ERD1 group and ERD2 group than in ER1 group and ER2 group (P < 0.05), respectively. The administration of dexmedetomidine combined with etomidate can attenuate the inhibition of etomidate on adrenocortical function in elderly patients and maintain intraoperative hemodynamic stability.

Preoperative sedation in children with congenital heart disease: 50% and 95% effective doses, hemodynamic effects, and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the 50% and 95% effective doses (ED50 and ED95, respectively), hemodynamic effects, and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine for preoperative sedation in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) with a left-to-right shunt. DESIGN: Double-blind sequential allocation trial. SETTING: Pediatric preoperative waiting area. PATIENTS: 86 pediatric patients ASA physical status II-III scheduled for cardiac surgery, aged1-month to 6-years-old with left-to-right type CHD. INTERVENTIONS: Children were divided into three groups according to age: infants (1 month-1 year), toddlers (1-3 years), and preschoolers (3-6 years). The first patient in all groups received intranasal dexmedetomidine (2 µg/kg), using the up-and-down Dixon method, and the and the next patient's dose was dependent on the previous patient's response. MEASUREMENTS: Assessment using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale and the Mask Acceptance Scale was performed before and every 5 min after treatment. Pulse oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at baseline, at 10-min intervals, and after admission to the operating room. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure was measured before anesthesia induction. MAIN RESULTS: The respective ED50 (95% confidence interval [CI]) and ED95 (95% CI) values for preoperative sedation using intranasally administered dexmedetomidine were 3.1 (2.8-3.3) and 3.5 (3.3-4.0) µg/kg for infants; 3.4 (3.2-3.6) and 3.9 (3.7-4.4) µg/kg for toddlers; and 2.4 (2.2-2.6) and 2.9 (2.6-3.3) µg/kg for preschoolers. ED50 was lower for preschoolers than for toddlers (p < 0.001) and infants (p = 0.044). No obvious difference in ED50 was found between infants and toddlers. There was no significant difference in sedation onset time among the groups, and no adverse events were observed during sedation in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine can be safety used for preoperative sedation in children with CHD and is effective for sedation when dosed appropriately. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov (ChiCTR2100047472); registered 20 June 2021.

The Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Perioperative Neurocognitive Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the effect of DEX on delayed dNCR (cognitive dysfunction ≥ 1 week postoperative) after cardiac surgery. BACKGROUND: DEX has salutary effects on cognitive outcomes following cardiac surgery, however, studies are limited by inconsistent assessment tools, timing, and definitions of dysfunction. It is imperative to identify accurate point estimates of effect of DEX on clinically relevant changes in cognitive function. METHODS: Randomized trials of adults undergoing cardiac surgery comparing perioperative DEX to placebo or alternate sedation and assessing cognitive function ≥ 1 week postoperative were included. Data was abstracted by three reviewers independently and in parallel according to PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcome is dNCR. To classify as dNCR, cognitive function must decrease by at least the minimal clinically important difference or accepted alternate measure (eg, Reliable Change Index ≥1.96). Bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Data was pooled using a random effects model. RESULTS: Nine trials (942 participants) were included in qualitative analysis, of which seven were included in the meta-analysis of dNCR. DEX reduced the incidence of dNCR (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.61, P < 0.0001) compared to placebo/no DEX. There was no difference in the incidence of delirium (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.35-1.34, P = 0.27) or incidence of hemodynamic instability (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.59-2.18, P = 0.70) associated with perioperative DEX. CONCLUSIONS: DEX reduced the incidence of dNCR 1 week after cardiac surgery. Although this meta-analysis demonstrates short term cognitive outcomes are improved after cardiac surgery with perioperative DEX, future trials examining long term cognitive outcomes, using robust cognitive assessments, and new perioperative neurocognitive disorders nomenclature with objective diagnostic criteria are necessary.

A pilot study of ADRA2A genotype association with doses of dexmedetomidine for sedation in pediatric patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Dexmedetomidine is titrated to achieve sedation in the pediatric and cardiovascular intensive care units (PICU and CVICU). In adults, dexmedetomidine response has been associated with an ADRA2A polymorphism (rs1800544); CC genotype is associated with an increased sedative response compared with GC and GG. To date, this has not been studied in children. DESIGN: We conducted a pilot study to determine whether ADRA2A genotype is associated with dexmedetomidine dose in children. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty intubated PICU or CVICU patients who received dexmedetomidine as a continuous infusion for at least 2 days were genotyped for ADRA2A with a custom-designed TaqMan® Assay. Ten (25%) subjects were wildtype (GG), 15 (37.5%) were heterozygous (GC), and 15 (37.5%) were homozygous (CC) variant. The maximum dexmedetomidine doses (mCg/kg/h) were not different between genotype groups CC (1, 0.3-1.2), GC (1, 0.3-1.3), and GG (0.8, 0.3-1.2), (p = 0.37); neither were mean dexmedetomidine doses for these respective genotype groups 0.68 (0.24-1.07), 0.72 (0.22-0.98), 0.58 (0.3-0.94), (p = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: These findings did not confirm the results from adult studies where ADRA2A polymorphisms correlate with dexmedetomidine response, therefore highlighting the need for pediatric studies to validate PGx findings in adults prior to implementation in pediatrics.

Determination of the Dose-Response Relationship of Epidural Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine for Labor Analgesia.

Background: The safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia have been reported in numerous literatures, but the optimal dose has not been fully determined. The objective of this study was to determine the dose-response relationship of epidural dexmedetomidine (combined with ropivacaine) for labor analgesia. Methods: A total of 120 full-term laboring parturients requesting epidural labor analgesia were enrolled in the study from July 5, 2020 to September 22, 2021. The parturients were randomly assigned to receive 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 or 0.5 µg/mL dexmedetomidine combined with 0.075% ropivacaine epidurally. An effective dose was defined as numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≤3 at 30-minutes of epidural drug injection. The dose-response relationship of dexmedetomidine (with ropivacaine) for epidural labor analgesia was performed using probit regression. The median effective dose (ED50) and the 95% effective dose (ED95) values for epidural dexmedetomidine combined with 0.075% ropivacaine with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by interpolation. Results: The estimated values of ED50 and ED95 with 95% CIs for epidural dexmedetomidine (combined with 0.075% ropivacaine) were 0.085 (0.015 to 0.133) µg/mL and 0.357 (0.287 to 0.493) µg/mL, respectively. No differences were found among groups for sensory block level, number of parturients with Bromage score >0, total dosage of analgesics, cesarean delivery rate, fetal birth weight, Apgar score at 1-minute, Apgar score at 5-minutes and adverse effects. Compared with other groups, group dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/mL had a longer duration of the first stage of labor. Conclusion: The ED50 and ED95 values of dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia was 0.085 and 0.357 µg/mL under the conditions of this study. Dexmedetomidine is a suitable adjuvant for epidural labor analgesia.